Volume 2, Issue 3

Original research papers

Radiation Protection

RADIATION RISK COMMUNICATION TO THE PATIENT

Jozef Kubinyi, Jozef Sabol, Jana Hudzietzová

Pages: 186-191

DOI: 10.21175/RadJ.2017.03.038

Received: 28 FEB 2017, Received revised: 7 MAY 2017, Accepted: 18 JUL 2017, Published online: 23 DEC 2017

Ionizing radiation and radionuclides are widely used in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy. Radiation related methods and procedures are especially useful in diagnostic applications where they provide valuable information about the patient conditions and problems. In this case, the effort is concentrated in obtaining the required diagnostic data while keeping the exposure to the patients to a very minimum level. On the other hand, the therapeutic use of radiation, in the form of external or internal exposure is aimed at delivering the relevant (rather high) doses to a particular volume in the organ or tissue in order to cure the tumour. In both of these modalities, the patients also receive a certain undesirable dose to healthy or normal tissues in the vicinity of the tumour. Obviously, any exposure may result in some stochastic effects characterized by a very small increase in the probability of developing additional cancers in years after the exposure. The paper discusses various methods of explaining the radiation risk to patients undergoing specific examinations or treatments involving radiation exposure. It also outlines the approach of the European Union and the situation in the Czech Republic.
  1. F. Mettler et al., “Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide,” Radiology,vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 520 – 531, Nov. 2009.
    DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2532082010
    PMid: 19789227
  2. J. Sabol and B. Šesták, “Communication with the public in radiation protection and nuclear safety and security,” in Proc. European Nuclear Conference - ENC 2014, pp. 150 – 157, Marseille, France, 2014.
    Retrieved from: http://www.euronuclear.org/events/enc/enc2014/transactions/ENC2014-transactions-reviewed.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Aug. 3, 2017
  3. J. Sabol et al, “Current Activities of the European Union in Fighting CBRN Terrorism Worldwide,” in Nuclear threats and security challenges, S. Apikyan and D. Diamond Eds., Los Angeles (CA), USA: Springer Science, 2015, ch. 15, pp. 157 – 167.
    DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9894-5
  4. “The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection”, Ann. ICRP, vol. 37, no. 2-4, 2007.
    Retrieved from: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP_Publication_103-Annals_of_the_ICRP_37(2-4)-Free_extract.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Aug. 3, 2017
  5. F. A. Stewart et al., “ICRP Statement on tissue reactions/Early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs – threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context,” Ann. ICRP, vol. 41, no. 1-2, 2012.
    Retrieved from: http://files.site-fusion.co.uk/webfusion117640/file/icrp118_1.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Aug. 3, 2017
  6. N. Hamada et al., “Emerging issues in radiogenic cataract and cardiovascular disease,” J. Radiat. Res.,vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 831 – 846, Sep. 2014.
    DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru036
    PMid: 24824673
    PMCid: PMC4202294
  7. K. Kamiya et al., “Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health,” Lancent, vol. 386, no. 9992, pp. 469 – 478, Aug. 2015.
    DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61167-9
  8. T. Lawrence et al., “Fears, feelings, and facts: Interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients,” AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.,vol. 196, no. 4, Apr. 2011.
    DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5956
  9. “Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedures,” NCRP, Bethesda (MD), USA, Rep. 168, 2010.
  10. K. Mück et al., “A proposal for radiation protection scale to better communicate with the public,” in Proc. IRPA-10 Int. Cong. Int. Rad. Prot. Assoc., Hiroshima, Japan, 2000.
    Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f64b/e03a893f14f3c7ae8c7de93f8b30b0499c90.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Jul. 10, 2017
  11. The Council of the European Union. (Dec. 5, 2013). Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom.
    Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/CELEX-32013L0059-EN-TXT.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Jul. 23, 2017
  12. The Parliament of the Czech Republic. (Nov. 6, 2011). Patient’s consent with provision of information in agreement with the Act No. 372/2011 Coll., on health services and the terms and conditions for the providing of such services.
    Retrieved from: https://www.dentmedico.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Pouceni-a-souhlas-pacienta-AJ.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Jul. 23, 2017