Volume 2, Issue 3

Original research papers

Radiology

MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INFRAORBITAL FORAMEN ON VOLUME-RENDERED CT SCANS

Marija Dakovic Bjelakovic, Jelena Popovic, Dragan Stojanov, Tanja Dzopalic, Jelena Ignjatovic

Pages: 204-209

DOI: 10.21175/RadJ.2017.03.041

Received: 15 FEB 2017, Received revised: 9 MAY 2017, Accepted: 4 JUL 2017, Published online: 23 DEC 2017

In this study, we aimed to analyze the variability in the size and localization of infraorbital foramen (IOF) with respect to the surrounding anatomical bony landmarks using the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) with the volume rendering and evaluate these morphometric parameters in relation to the gender and side. The cranial CT scans of 60 living adult subjects, without any trauma or malformation of facial bones were included in the study. Data of the subjects were collected in the Center of Radiology, Clinical Center Nis, Serbia. Measurements included the transverse and vertical diameter of the IOF foramen, the distance from IOF to facial midline, the distance to lateral margin of the piriform aperture, the distance to infraorbital margin and the distance to maxillary alveolar border. All measurements were done bilaterally and performed with a digital coordinate caliper. Obtained results were statistically analyzed. Observation of 120 hemi-skulls revealed that the IOF was present in all of them. The mean transverse diameter of the IOF was 2.81 ± 0.69 mm and the mean vertical diameter was 3.41 ± 0.88 mm. The IOF was located at an mean distance 26.17 ± 1.69 mm from facial midline, 14.99 ± 1.30 mm from the lateral margin of the piriform aperture, 9.06 ± 1.01 mm below the IOM and 28.22 ± 2.78 mm above the maxillary alveolar border. Statistically significant difference was found between males and females for the distance from IOF to PA (p < 0.05). These morphometric characteristics may have important implications for the surgical and local anesthetic planning.
  1. Gray’s anatomy, P. L. Williams, R. Warwick, M. Dyson, L. H. Bannister, Eds., 37th ed., Edinburg, UK: Churchil Livingstone, 1989.
  2. K. L. Moore and A. F. Dalley, Clinically oriented anatomy, 5th ed., Philadelphia (PA), USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
  3. C. T. Mcqueen, D. C. Diruggiero, J. P. Campbell and W. W. Shockly, “Orbital osteology: A study of the surgical lendmarks,” Laryngoscope, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 783 – 788, Aug. 1995.
    DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199508000-00003
    PMid: 7630287
  4. G. A. Salam, “Regional anesthesia for office procedures: part I. Head and neck surgeries,” Am. Fam. Physician, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 585 – 590, Feb. 2004.
    Retrieved from: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0201/p585.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017
  5. D. J. Kleier, D. K. Deeg and R. C. Averbach, “The extraoral approach to the infraorbital nerve block,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 758 – 760, Nov. 1983.
    Retrieved from: http://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177%2883%2975018-X/pdf
    Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
  6. S. R. Aziz, J. M. Marchena and A. Puran, “Anatomic characteristics of the infraorbital foramen: a cadaveric study,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 992 – 996, Sep. 2000.
    DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.8742
    PMid: 10981979
  7. M. Kazkayasi, A. Ergin, M. Ersoy, O. Bengi, I. Tekdemir and A. Elhan, “Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen - canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study,” Laryngoscope, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 609 – 614, Apr. 2001.
    DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200104000-00010
    PMid: 11359128
  8. B. Cutright, N. Quillopa and W. Schubert, “An antropometric analysis of the key foramina for maxillofacial surgery,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 354 – 357, Mar. 2003.
    DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50070
    PMid: 12618976
  9. S. Agthong, T. Huanmanop and V. Chentanez, “Anatomical variations of the supraorbital, infraorbital and mental foramina related to the gender and side,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 800 – 804, Jun. 2005.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.016
    PMid: 15944977
  10. T. Gupta, “Localization of the important facial foramina encountered in maxillo-facial surgery,” Clin. Anat., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 633 – 644, Oct. 2008.
    DOI: 10.1002/ca.20688
    PMid: 18773483
  11. B. R. Chrcanovic, M. H. Nogueira, G. Abreu and A. L. N. Custodio, “A morphometric analysis of the supraorbital and infraorbital foramina relative to surgical landmarcs,” Surg. Radiol. Anat., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 329 – 335, May 2011.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00276-010-0698-1
    PMid: 20625730
  12. A. Aggarwal et al., “Anatomical study of the infraorbital foramen: a basis for successful infraorbital nerve block,” Clin. Anat., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 753 – 760, Sep. 2015.
    DOI: 10.1002/ca.22558
    PMid: 26119635
  13. S. H. Hwang et al., “Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital groove, canal, and foramen on three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans,” Surg. Radiol. Anat., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 565 – 571, Sep. 2013.
    DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1077-5
    PMid: 23404562
  14. H. Jung et al., “Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional rendered imaging of the human skull acquired from multi-detector row computed tomography,” J. Digit. Imaging, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 232 – 239, Dec. 2002.
    DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0031-6
    PMid: 12532254
    PMCid: PMC3611620
  15. S. Perandini, N. Faccioli, A. Zaccarella, T. Re and R. P. Mucelli, “The diagnostic contribution of CT volumetric rendering techniques in routine practice,” Indian. J. Radiol. Imaging, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 92 – 97, May 2010.
    DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.63043
    PMid: 20607017
    PMCid: PMC2890933
  16. B. S. Kuszyk, D. G. Heath, D. F. Bliss and E. K. Fishman, “Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering,” Skeletal. Radiol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 207 – 214, Apr. 1996.
    DOI: 10.1007/s002560050066
    PMid: 8741053
  17. J. K. Berge and R. A. Bergman, “Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull,” Clin. Anat., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 406 – 413, Nov. 2001.
    DOI: 10.1002/ca.1075
    PMid: 11754234
  18. A. B. Berry, “Factors affecting the incidence of non-metrical skeletal variants,” J. Anat., vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 519 – 535, Dec. 1975.
    Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1231693/pdf/janat00377-0100.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
  19. A. Carolineberry and R. J. Berry, “Epygenetic variations in the human cranium,” J. Anat., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 361 – 379, Apr. 1967.
    Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1270890/pdf/janat00410-0155.pdf;
    Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
  20. T. J. Leo, M. Cassell and R. A. Bergman, “Variation in human infraorbital nerve, canal and foramen,” Ann. Anat., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 93 – 95, Jan. 1995.
    DOI: 10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80139-1
  21. M. Kazkayasi, A. Ergin, M. Ersoy, I. Tekdemir and A. Elhan, “Microscopic anatomy of the infraorbital canal, nerve, and foramen,” Otolaryngol. Head. Neck. Surg., vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 629 – 697, Dec. 2003.
    DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)01575-4
  22. M. L. Lynch, S. A. Syverud, R. A. Schwab, J. M. Jenkins and R. Edlich, “Comparison of intraoral and percutaneous approaches for infraorbital nerve block,” Acad. Emerg. Med., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 514 – 519, Nov-Dec. 1994.
    Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02543.x/pdf;
    Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017