|
MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INFRAORBITAL FORAMEN
ON VOLUME-RENDERED CT SCANS
Marija Dakovic Bjelakovic, Jelena Popovic, Dragan Stojanov, Tanja Dzopalic, Jelena Ignjatovic
Pages: 204-209
DOI: 10.21175/RadJ.2017.03.041
Received: 15 FEB 2017, Received revised: 9 MAY 2017, Accepted: 4 JUL 2017, Published online: 23 DEC 2017
Abstract |
References |
Full Text (PDF)
In this study, we aimed to analyze the variability in the size and localization of infraorbital foramen (IOF) with respect to the surrounding anatomical bony landmarks using the three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) with the volume rendering and evaluate these morphometric parameters in relation to the gender and side. The cranial CT scans of 60 living adult subjects, without any trauma or malformation of facial bones were included in the study. Data of the subjects were collected in the Center of Radiology, Clinical Center Nis, Serbia. Measurements included the transverse and vertical diameter of the IOF foramen, the distance from IOF to facial midline, the distance to lateral margin of the piriform aperture, the distance to infraorbital margin and the distance to maxillary alveolar border. All measurements were done bilaterally and performed with a digital coordinate caliper. Obtained results were statistically analyzed. Observation of 120 hemi-skulls revealed that the IOF was present in all of them. The mean transverse diameter of the IOF was 2.81 ± 0.69 mm and the mean vertical diameter was 3.41 ± 0.88 mm. The IOF was located at an mean distance 26.17 ± 1.69 mm from facial midline, 14.99 ± 1.30 mm from the lateral margin of the piriform aperture, 9.06 ± 1.01 mm below the IOM and 28.22 ± 2.78 mm above the maxillary alveolar border. Statistically significant difference was found between males and females for the distance from IOF to PA (p < 0.05). These morphometric characteristics may have important implications for the surgical and local anesthetic planning.
- Gray’s anatomy, P. L. Williams, R. Warwick, M. Dyson, L. H. Bannister, Eds., 37th ed., Edinburg, UK: Churchil Livingstone, 1989.
- K. L. Moore and A. F. Dalley, Clinically oriented anatomy, 5th ed., Philadelphia (PA), USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
- C. T. Mcqueen, D. C. Diruggiero, J. P. Campbell and W. W. Shockly, “Orbital osteology: A study of the surgical lendmarks,” Laryngoscope, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 783 – 788, Aug. 1995.
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199508000-00003 PMid: 7630287
- G. A. Salam, “Regional anesthesia for office procedures: part I. Head and neck surgeries,” Am. Fam. Physician, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 585 – 590, Feb. 2004.
Retrieved from: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0201/p585.pdf; Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017
- D. J. Kleier, D. K. Deeg and R. C. Averbach, “The extraoral approach to the infraorbital nerve block,” J. Am. Dent. Assoc., vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 758 – 760, Nov. 1983.
Retrieved from: http://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177%2883%2975018-X/pdf Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
- S. R. Aziz, J. M. Marchena and A. Puran, “Anatomic characteristics of the infraorbital foramen: a cadaveric study,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 992 – 996, Sep. 2000.
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.8742 PMid: 10981979
- M. Kazkayasi, A. Ergin, M. Ersoy, O. Bengi, I. Tekdemir and A. Elhan, “Certain anatomical relations and the precise morphometry of the infraorbital foramen - canal and groove: an anatomical and cephalometric study,” Laryngoscope, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 609 – 614, Apr. 2001.
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200104000-00010 PMid: 11359128
- B. Cutright, N. Quillopa and W. Schubert, “An antropometric analysis of the key foramina for maxillofacial surgery,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 354 – 357, Mar. 2003.
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50070 PMid: 12618976
- S. Agthong, T. Huanmanop and V. Chentanez, “Anatomical variations of the supraorbital, infraorbital and mental foramina related to the gender and side,” J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 800 – 804, Jun. 2005.
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.02.016 PMid: 15944977
- T. Gupta, “Localization of the important facial foramina encountered in maxillo-facial surgery,” Clin. Anat., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 633 – 644, Oct. 2008.
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20688 PMid: 18773483
- B. R. Chrcanovic, M. H. Nogueira, G. Abreu and A. L. N. Custodio, “A morphometric analysis of the supraorbital and infraorbital foramina relative to surgical landmarcs,” Surg. Radiol. Anat., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 329 – 335, May 2011.
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-010-0698-1 PMid: 20625730
- A. Aggarwal et al., “Anatomical study of the infraorbital foramen: a basis for successful infraorbital nerve block,” Clin. Anat., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 753 – 760, Sep. 2015.
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22558 PMid: 26119635
- S. H. Hwang et al., “Morphometric analysis of the infraorbital groove, canal, and foramen on three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography scans,” Surg. Radiol. Anat., vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 565 – 571, Sep. 2013.
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1077-5 PMid: 23404562
- H. Jung et al., “Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional rendered imaging of the human skull acquired from multi-detector row computed tomography,” J. Digit. Imaging, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 232 – 239, Dec. 2002.
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0031-6 PMid: 12532254 PMCid: PMC3611620
- S. Perandini, N. Faccioli, A. Zaccarella, T. Re and R. P. Mucelli, “The diagnostic contribution of CT volumetric rendering techniques in routine practice,” Indian. J. Radiol. Imaging, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 92 – 97, May 2010.
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.63043 PMid: 20607017 PMCid: PMC2890933
- B. S. Kuszyk, D. G. Heath, D. F. Bliss and E. K. Fishman, “Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering,” Skeletal. Radiol., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 207 – 214, Apr. 1996.
DOI: 10.1007/s002560050066 PMid: 8741053
- J. K. Berge and R. A. Bergman, “Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull,” Clin. Anat., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 406 – 413, Nov. 2001.
DOI: 10.1002/ca.1075 PMid: 11754234
- A. B. Berry, “Factors affecting the incidence of non-metrical skeletal variants,” J. Anat., vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 519 – 535, Dec. 1975.
Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1231693/pdf/janat00377-0100.pdf; Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
- A. Carolineberry and R. J. Berry, “Epygenetic variations in the human cranium,” J. Anat., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 361 – 379, Apr. 1967.
Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1270890/pdf/janat00410-0155.pdf; Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017.
- T. J. Leo, M. Cassell and R. A. Bergman, “Variation in human infraorbital nerve, canal and foramen,” Ann. Anat., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 93 – 95, Jan. 1995.
DOI: 10.1016/S0940-9602(11)80139-1
- M. Kazkayasi, A. Ergin, M. Ersoy, I. Tekdemir and A. Elhan, “Microscopic anatomy of the infraorbital canal, nerve, and foramen,” Otolaryngol. Head. Neck. Surg., vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 629 – 697, Dec. 2003.
DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)01575-4
- M. L. Lynch, S. A. Syverud, R. A. Schwab, J. M. Jenkins and R. Edlich, “Comparison of intraoral and percutaneous approaches for infraorbital nerve block,” Acad. Emerg. Med., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 514 – 519, Nov-Dec. 1994.
Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02543.x/pdf; Retrieved on: Feb. 12, 2017
|